
The ECAC-West has just six teams and so does not have an Automatic
Qualifier, or AQ, for the NCAA tournament. The NCAA requires a conference to
field at least seven teams before it can send an AQ to the NCAA Div. III men’s
ice hockey tournament. Thus, this year, any team from the ECAC-West with
realistic hopes for the NCAA had to wait for the NCAA to designate its three
Pool-C, or at-large, qualifiers before learning whether they’d make the
tournament.
The conference members, in order of the final regular season standings, are: Utica, Hobart, Neumann, Manhattanville, Elmira and
Nazareth. Utica finished the season
11-3-1 in conference and 20-5-1 overall.
Utica and Hobart were consistently ranked high all season in media
polls such as USCHO.com and D3Hockey rankings (links found on left sidebar). However, the hockey media is not used to
determine which three teams qualify for the at large bids. Instead, the NCAA
uses its own regional rankings, which were released publicly on February
12, 19 and 27. The NCAA regional
rankings rate 16 teams from the east and 8 from the west. A fourth set of
rankings was generated on Selection Sunday, March 3rd, but those were
not released to the public.
As of February 19th, Utica and Hobart were ranked first and third, respectively, in the Regional Rankings. Because of this many observers concluded both teams had a lock on two of the available three spots from Pool-C.
![]() |
Hobart's mascot was not happy about missing the tourney |
Neumann and Manhattanville faced off for the ECAC-West crown March 2nd with Neumann pulling away with a 3-0 victory but neither team figured high
enough in the NCAA regional rankings to merit consideration for an NCAA Pool-C
bid.
Because of their conference tournament loses Utica and Hobart dropped
to second and sixth, respectively, in the NCAA regional rankings
released on February 27th. With no more games to play neither could
do anything to help improve their ranking before selection Sunday. Hobart’s
fate would be determined in other conference tournaments. With Norwich losing
the ECAC-East final at home to Babson, in what some considered an upset, the
Cadets were out as an AQ, but, as the number 1 team in the Regional Rankings, jumped
right into Pool-C. Norwich ended up with one Pool-C bid, Utica took one and a western
team, Wisconsin Eau Claire, took the other. This left the Statesmen with
nothing to do but watch lacrosse by the Finger Lakes.
Utica and the ECAC-West in the NCAAs.
This will be Utica’s first appearance in the NCAA tournament, but
others from the conference have done well in the past.
In 2008 and again in 2009, three
teams from ECAC-West made the field of eleven.
2009 saw one of the field, Neumann, go on to win it all, having to
best two of its conference mates along the way. The Knights beat Elmira in a
first round NCAA game, and then knocked out Hobart in the national semi-final. A 4-1 win over Gustavus Adolphus of the MIAC gave
the Knights the 2009 National Championship.
In 2010 Elmira was included in the field of 11 where they bested
ECAC-NE champion Curry,4-1, in the first round before being eliminated by
Norwich in OT, 2-1.
Again in 2011 two teams from the ECAC-West, Neumann and conference
Champion Elmira both made the field. Elmira was dispatched by Adrian of the
MCHA while Neumann traveled to Brunswick and was eliminated by Bowdoin 2-1 in a
rock ‘em, sock ‘em affair.
Last year, Elmira again made the field of eleven but was dumped by
Oswego,5-0, in the first round.
How have Utica and the ECAC-West done against
NESCAC this year?
![]() |
Utica bested Amherst,4-3, at the Aud in November |
Hobart thumped Hamilton 8-1 in another early non-conference affair.
Conference tournament runner up Manhattanville, which held a 13th place regional ranking on February 27th, pounded Tufts, beat
Connecticut College, and lost to Trinity. Manhattanville was 1-2-1 against Utica this year including the Valiants’
2-1 tournament win on 2/23.
Elmira, 5th place at 5-10 in the ECAC-West and 10-16
overall, lost to Amherst 5-1 and to Wesleyan 5-2 in the Cardinal Classic over
the winter break. Elmira was 1-2 against Utica with decidedly mixed results on
a weekend series in November at the Aud. Elmira suffered an 11-2 humiliation
the first night just to bounce back the second day for a 7-4 win. The Pioneer’s
regular goaltender Nick Therrien did not start the second game of the weekend but
was called on to play the final 35 minutes; he gave up 3 goals along with an
empty netter. In mid-January, the
Pioneers traveled to Elmira and took the rubber match 6-4.
Only Neumann and last place Nazareth played no one in NESCAC.
Bowdoin’s history against the ECAC-West.
The only game between Bowdoin and an ECAC-West team during the last
four seasons was the first round NCAA playoff game on March 9, 2011.
Bowdoin, at 19-8-1 overall, had won the NESCAC conference championship
at Williams. 2011 was the last season
of the interlocked schedule between the ECAC-East and NESCAC. The Polar Pears, at 11-7-1 in the conference,
finished tied for third with Middlebury and Amherst but were seeded fifth because of tiebreakers. Bowdoin took a road win at Amherst in the quarterfinal
before beating Colby in the semi-final and the host, Williams, for the hardware
and the NCAA tournament AQ.
Neumann had been the ECAC-West runner-up and received one of the
coveted Pool-C bids for the NCAA tournament. The game itself was a rough one. Neumann accumulated 42 minutes in penalties with nine minors, a five-minute
major and two ten-minute (game) misconducts, while the PBs were whistled
for nine minors. There were four sets of
matching minors.
Neumann drew first blood with a first period shorthanded goal. Bowdoin
took the lead in the second period on goals by Bryan Rosata and current senior Rob
Tozcylowski. This was definitely a case of secondary scoring as it was Senior
Rosata’s first goal of the year and sophomore Tozcylowski’s fifth of
the season. While the first two periods were evenly played, Neumann pressed
hard in the third, outshooting Bowdoin 12-6 for the period. Bowdoin’s Steve
Messina, then a freshman, made 33 saves for the 2-1 win.
Thanks to Bowdoin Sports Info, we have video of both goals from the 2011 Tourney game.
Thanks to Bowdoin Sports Info, we have video of both goals from the 2011 Tourney game.
No comments:
Post a Comment